Community Budgeting 5 Survey Monkey Responses
57 people responded to the SurveyMonkey on Community Budgeting Phase 5.
- 14.04% G60
- 45.61% G81
- 22.81% G8217.54% G83
Almost 65% of respondents submitted an application for Phase 5 & 29% voting using our online voting platform.
We asked if Phase 5 being a digital experience presented any difficulties for respondents or their group. Opinion on this was split, 42% of respondents answered yes and 58% answered no.
We asked what could be put in place to support groups & individuals to develop digital skills.
Some of the most common responses were as follows:
- More funding for literacy & IT skills in poorer areas.
- Make the process simpler with less steps to follow
- One to one help and advice.
- Voting in libraries with volunteers to assist those who have no access to computers / internet.
We also asked what some of the positives of Phase 5 were:
- Wide range of local groups being allocated funding.
- Large number of applications received.
- Online process was well done given Covid restrictions.
- Good to use social media to canvas for votes.
- Clear application process
21% of respondents found out about CB5 on social media, 14% by the Council website and 51% by email.
Respondents were asked if the application process was easy to understand. An overwhelming majority (79%) voted yes. Some of the comments from those that voted no included:
- The application form is not compatible with tablets and iPads.
- Use plain language.
We asked if the voting site was easy to use. 62% voted yes and 38% voted no. When asked how to make it easier to vote, common suggestions were;
- Improve sign in / registration process.
- Include submit button to avoid uncertainty as to whether votes would count.
- Make it easier to search for groups.
- Simplify registration process - one click process.
- Consider those with autism and other learning disabilities when designing site.
We asked if the Communities Team were helpful & available to respond to queries. 81% of respondents voted yes.
Other common comments we received include:
- Make use of postal / in person votes to avoid digital exclusion.
- Votes should be ranked.
- Weighting for smaller groups.